Download PDF Document In Hindi. (Rs.40/-) कंपनी अधिनियम, 1956 की अनुसूची XIII के संशोधन के बाद प्रबंध निदेशक की नियुक्ति के लिए संकल्प, डब्ल्यू.ई.एफ. 14 जुलाई, 1993   हल किया गया है कि अनुसूची XIII के साथ पठित धारा 269 के प्रावधानों और कंपनी अधिनियम, 1956 के किसी भी अन्य लागू प्रावधानों के अधीन और कंपनी के एसोसिएशन के लेख के अनुच्छेद संख्या ......... के अनुसार और आगे के विषय वित्तीय संस्थाओं, बैंकों, आदि के अनुमोदन के लिए जिनके साथ कंपनी की कोई उधार व्यवस्था है और जहां, ऐसी व्यवस्था के तहत उनकी मंजूरी आवश्यक है, श्री ………………… .... हो और एतद्द्वारा कंपनी के बीच मसौदा समझौते में व्यक्त और निहित नियमों और शर्तों पर ............... से शुरू होने वाले 5 (पांच) वर्षों की अवधि के लिए कंपनी के प्रबंध निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त किया जाता है। और कहा श्री. ......... को पटल पर रखा गया है और इस मद के लिए अध्यक्ष द्वारा हस्ताक्षर किए गए हैं, पहचान के उद्देश्य से, कौन सा मसौदा है और इसके द्वारा अनुमोदित भी किया जाता है।   और आगे संकल्प किया कि कंपनी अधिनियम, 1956 की धारा 269 के तहत धारा 198, 309 और केंद्र सरकार के तहत एक आम बैठक में सदस्यों के अनुमोदन के अधीन और किसी भी अन्य लागू प्रावधानों और भी अनुच्छेद ....... कंपनी के अंतर्नियमों का और साथ ही उन वित्तीय संस्थानों, बैंकों आदि के बारे में जिनके साथ कंपनी की कोई उधार व्यवस्था है और जहां ऐसी व्यवस्था के तहत उनकी मंजूरी आवश्यक है, उक्त श्री ……… कंपनी के प्रबंध निदेशक के रूप में उनकी सेवाओं के लिए ............... से निम्नलिखित पारिश्रमिक का भुगतान किया जाएगा   वेतन   रुपये का वेतन। 50,000 (पचास हजार रुपये मात्र) प्रति माह।   अनुलाभ   उपरोक्त के अलावा, प्रबंध निदेशक वार्षिक वेतन के बराबर राशि या रु....... प्रति वर्ष, जो भी कम हो, तक सीमित निम्नलिखित अनुलाभों के हकदार होंगे। जब तक संदर्भ के लिए अन्यथा आवश्यक न हो, अनुलाभों को तीन श्रेणियों 'ए', 'बी' और 'सी' में निम्नानुसार वर्गीकृत किया जाता है।     श्रेणी 'ए'   इसमें मकान किराया भत्ता, छुट्टी यात्रा रियायत, चिकित्सा प्रतिपूर्ति, क्लबों पर शुल्क और व्यक्तिगत दुर्घटना बीमा शामिल होगा। इन्हें निम्नानुसार प्रदान किया जाएगा:   (i) आवास I: प्रबंध निदेशक के लिए सुसज्जित आवास किराए पर लेने पर कंपनी द्वारा व्यय निम्नलिखित सीमा के अधीन होगा:   वेतन का साठ प्रतिशत, प्रबंध निदेशक द्वारा देय दस प्रतिशत से अधिक।   आवास II: यदि आवास कंपनी के स्वामित्व में है, तो प्रबंध निदेशक के वेतन का दस प्रतिशत कंपनी द्वारा काटा जाएगा।   आवास III: यदि कंपनी द्वारा कोई आवास उपलब्ध नहीं कराया जाता है, तो प्रबंध निदेशक आवास 1 में निर्धारित उच्चतम सीमा के अधीन मकान किराया भत्ता पाने का हकदार होगा।   स्पष्टीकरण.-कंपनी द्वारा गैस, बिजली, पानी और साज-सज्जा पर किए गए व्यय का मूल्यांकन आयकर नियम, 1962 के अनुसार किया जाएगा। हालांकि, यह प्रबंधन के वेतन के दस प्रतिशत की उच्चतम सीमा के अधीन होगा। निर्देशक।   (ii) चिकित्सा प्रतिपूर्ति।-प्रबंध निदेशक और परिवार के लिए एक वर्ष में एक महीने के वेतन या तीन साल की अवधि में तीन महीने के वेतन की उच्चतम सीमा के अधीन खर्च।   (iii) अवकाश यात्रा रियायत।- प्रबंध निदेशक और उनके परिवार के लिए कंपनी द्वारा निर्दिष्ट किसी भी नियम के अनुसार वर्ष में एक बार खर्च किया गया।   (iv) क्लब शुल्क।- क्लबों की फीस अधिकतम दो क्लबों के अधीन। इसमें प्रवेश और आजीवन सदस्यता शुल्क शामिल नहीं होगा।   (v) व्यक्तिगत दुर्घटना बीमा।-प्रीमियम रुपये से अधिक नहीं होना चाहिए। 4,000 प्रति वर्ष।   व्याख्या.-श्रेणी डब्ल्यू के प्रयोजन के लिए, 'परिवार' का अर्थ प्रबंध निदेशक के पति या पत्नी, आश्रित बच्चों और आश्रित माता-पिता से है।   श्रेणी 'बी'   1. भविष्य निधि, सेवानिवृत्ति निधि या वार्षिकी निधि में योगदान को अनुलाभों की अधिकतम सीमा की गणना में उस सीमा तक शामिल नहीं किया जाएगा, जब तक कि ये अकेले या एक साथ मिलकर आयकर अधिनियम के तहत कर योग्य नहीं हैं। देय ग्रेच्युटी सेवा के प्रत्येक पूर्ण वर्ष के लिए आधे महीने के वेतन से अधिक नहीं होगी।   2. कार्यकाल के अंत में छुट्टी का नकदीकरण अनुलाभों की अधिकतम सीमा की गणना में शामिल नहीं किया जाएगा।   श्रेणी 'सी'   कंपनी के व्यवसाय में उपयोग के लिए कार और निवास पर टेलीफोन के प्रावधान को अनुलाभ के रूप में नहीं माना जाएगा। टेलीफोन पर व्यक्तिगत लंबी दूरी की कॉल और निजी उद्देश्य के लिए कार का उपयोग कंपनी द्वारा प्रबंध निदेशक को बिल किया जाएगा।   आयोग   वेतन और अनुलाभों के अतिरिक्त कमीशन के रूप में पारिश्रमिक की भी अनुमति होगी। किसी विशेष वर्ष में कंपनी के शुद्ध लाभ के आधार पर इसकी राशि, धारा 198 और धारा 309 में निर्धारित समग्र सीमा के अधीन होगी।   यहां कुछ भी होने के बावजूद, जहां, किसी भी वित्तीय वर्ष में, प्रबंध निदेशक के कार्यकाल की अवधि के दौरान कंपनी को कोई लाभ नहीं होता है या उसका लाभ अपर्याप्त होता है, कंपनी उसे ऊपर निर्दिष्ट वेतन और अनुलाभों के माध्यम से पारिश्रमिक का भुगतान करेगी। और आगे संकल्प किया गया कि सभी आवश्यक अनुमोदन प्राप्त करने के बाद और प्रबंध निदेशक के साथ मसौदा समझौते में शामिल होने के बाद, शेयरधारकों, वित्तीय संस्थानों, बैंकों आदि द्वारा निर्धारित सभी संशोधनों, परिवर्तनों, विलोपन आदि को लागू किया जाएगा। और यदि श्री …………… को स्वीकार्य है, तो समझौते के अंतिम प्रारूप को आवश्यक स्टाम्प पेपर (नों) पर लगाया जाना चाहिए और कंपनी की सामान्य मुहर को किसी एक की उपस्थिति में समझौते के ऐसे स्टाम्पित तल्लीनता (ओं) पर चिपका दिया जाना चाहिए। कंपनी के निदेशक और यह कि निदेशक, जिनकी उपस्थिति में सामान्य मुहर इस प्रकार लगाई जाएगी, कंपनी के लिए और कंपनी की ओर से अनुबंध पर हस्ताक्षर और निष्पादन करते हैं और यह कि श्री ......... कंपनी सचिव

Application under Section 109 & 123 of CrPC  IN THE COURT OF THE LD. SDM (U) EXERCISING THE POWERS OF  EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE AT ……………… Application No.:______ of ………… 1.  2  Applicant/Suspect  Versus Respondents Application under Section 109 & 123 of CrPC for releasing on bail the applicant/suspect on furnishing sureties/securities to the satisfaction of this Ld. court. Respectfully Sheweth:- 1. That the applicants/suspects have been kept in police custody since ___________________ by the SHO of Police Station: ____________________ on the suspicion of likely to commit a cognizable offence under Sections of IPC. 2. That the applicants submit that they are innocent and have neither any intention of committing any such offence nor have ever committed any such offence. The applicants have been falsely implicated in the said case by some person with vested interest to harass the applicant. 3. That by keeping the applicants/suspects under custody and arrested the applicants have been deprived of their valuable fundamental right of liberty by abuse of legal provisions and process of law by the complainant. 4. That the applicants are willing to furnish surety and bail bonds to the satisfaction of this Ld. Court in case they are ordered to be released on bail. The applicants are also willing to join the investigations and bind himself by the terms and conditions laid down by the law or by this Ld. court. It is further submitted that the applicant is not at all required for the investigations and the investigations are over. However, if the applicant is required for investigation, the applicant/suspect undertakes to be present as and when required in accordance with the law. 5. That neither any recovery is to be effected from the applicant nor the applicant is in a position to temper with the prosecution evidence. The applicant will associate with the investigation when ever required to do so. It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that:- (a) that the applicants may be ordered to be released on bail and this application for bail may kindly be allowed; (b) that till the decision of this application interim bail may be granted to the applicants; (c) Such other orders be also passed in favour of the applicant as deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice. .…………… Applicant ______ Through, Advocates Note:- This application is filed through the next friend of the applicants/suspect as the applicants are in police custody. It is, therefore, prayed that the application of the applicant/suspect may kindly be allowed and the applicant/suspect may kindly be released on interim bail in the interest of Justice. …………………………. Applicant _____ Through counsels  IN THE COURT OF LD SDM (U) EXERCISING POWERS OF EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE AT ………………………….                   …………………………..                                                          Applicant  Versus …………….. ………...                                                                Respondent  Affidavit in support of the application I, __________________________, do hereby solemnly affirms and declare as under:- 1. That the accompanying application has been drafted at my instance and under my instructions. 2. That the contents of paras 1 to _________________________ are true and correct to the best of my  knowledge. 3. That I further solemnly affirm and declare that this affidavit of mine is correct and true, no part of it is  false and nothing material has been concealed therein. Affirmed here at …………….. on ______.  FORM NO. 13 Bond for Good Behaviour (See sections 108, 109 and 110) WHERES I, _________________________ .(name, inhabitant of (place) ____________________________________ have been called upon to enter, into a bond to be of good behaviour to Government and all the citizens of India for the term of _______.(state the period) or until the completion of the inquiry in the matter of pending in the court of _____ . I hereby bind myself to be of good behaviour to Government and all the citizens of India during the said term or until the completion of' the said inquiry; and, in case of my making default therein, I hereby, myself to forfeit to Government the sum of rupees _____________________. Dated, this ___________ day of ______ (Seal of the court) (Signature)  (Where a bond with sureties to be executed, add .) We do hereby declare ourselves sureties for the above-named __________________________. that he will be of good behaviour to Government and all the citizens of India during the said term or until tile completion of the said enquiry; and, in case of his making default therein, we bind ourselves, jointly and severally, to forfeit to Government the sum of rupees . Dated, this ______ _________________(Seal of the court) (Signature)  Download Word Document In English. (Rs.40/-) Download PDF Document In Marathi. (Rs.40/)

लेखा परीक्षकों की नियुक्ति का संकल्प   संकल्प किया जाता है कि ............ को कंपनी के लेखा परीक्षकों के रूप में नियुक्त किया जाता है और इस बैठक के समापन से वित्तीय वर्ष के लिए कंपनी के खातों की लेखा परीक्षा के लिए अगली वार्षिक आम बैठक के समापन तक पद धारण करने के लिए नियुक्त किया जाता है। रुपये का पारिश्रमिक। …………… प्लस जेब से बाहर, यात्रा और रहने का खर्च। Download PDF Document In Hindi. (Rs.15/-)

CRIMINAL APPEAL U/S 374 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1973 IN THE COURT OF THE   DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE AT PUNE                                                                                Criminal Appeal No. /2003 Shri N _ S P                       ) Age 36 years, occupation - service,     )Resident of Mehetre Vasti, Chikhali,    )Taluka Haveli, District - Pune.                ) Versus The State of Maharashtra                ) (Notice to be served on the              ) District Government Pleader,            ) Pune 411 005                                    ) Appellant (Original Accused) Respondent (Original Complainant) CRIMINAL APPEAL U/S 374 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1973 MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR (I) Brief History of the Case is as follows: 1. That the appellant was charged with and tried for the offence punishable u/s 304(A) of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to suffer SI for one month and also to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- I/d to suffer further SI for seven days. 2. That the said order of punishment has been passed by the Hon'ble Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Vadgaon Maval, in S.T.C.C. No. 1100/2000. 3. That the said judgment and order of punishment have been passed by the Hon'ble Trial Court on 7.3.2003. 4. That the Hon'ble Trial Court was pleased to hold the appellant guilty for the said offence u/s 304(A) of the Indian Penal Code. That the alleged incident took place in the property bearing Gat No. 1426, Mehetre Vasti of the revenue village Chikhali, Taluka Haveli, District Pune, where the appellant was constructing a new house for the residence of his family, while the appellant himself is working in Mumbai, and he occasionally and during holidays visits his family residing at the place where he has constructed a new house. 5. That the said work of construction of the house was assigned to a contractor, and the father of the appellant; who is old enough, used to visit and supervise the construction work from time to time. 6. That the appellant being in regular service at Mumbai could not visit or supervise or look after the construction activity of the said work, and had hardly paid any attention to the same personally. 7. That the prosecution has examined in all eight witnesses, but no witness on behalf of the accused was examined, and the appellant is so unfortunate that while recording the statement of the accused u/s 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, despite an enquiry made by the Hon'ble Lower Court as to  whether he had to examine any defence witness, the accused being totally ignorant and completely innocent did not avail of the opportunity offered to him, and therefore, no witness on his behalf or at his instance could be examined. 8. That the appellant respectfully submits that with a view to meeting the ends of justice, there should have been, at least, one witness, i.e. the father of the accused-appellant, who used to attend to and supervise the work of construction personally,  should  have been examined on behalf of the defence, but this did not happen, and for the same, the whole blame goes to none but the defence only. 9. That even though the said accident took place between 16.30 hours and 20.30 hours on 17.6.2000, the panchnama was drawn two days thereafter on 19.6.2000. (II) BEING AGGRIEVED BY AND DISSATISFIED WITH the judgment and order, dated 7.3.2003, passed by the Hon'ble Judicial Magistrate, Vadgaon Maval, in S.T.C.C. No. 1100/2000, the present appellant prefers this memo of appeal on the following amongst the other grounds of objections thereto : 1. That the Learned Lower Court has not followed proper procedure, and this has resulted into miscarriage of justice.  2. That the orders passed by the Learned Lower Court are violative of the principles of justice, equity and good conscience. 3. That the  orders  passed by the Learned Lower Court are contrary to the provisions of law and the principles of natural justice. 4. That the Learned Lower Court has failed to consider the evidence on record in a judicious manner. 5. That the findings arrived at by the Learned Lower Court are not supported by the evidence on record. 6. That the necessary issues of law and the facts have not been framed and answered by the Learned Lower Court, 7. That the Learned Trial Court ought to have acquitted the accused-appellant for the benefit of doubt for the great many controversies committed in the evidence adduced by almost all the prosecution witnesses. 8. That the  Hon'ble  Lower Court ought to  have  taken  into account the very fact that there was a glaring mistake on the part of the prosecution to the effect that when the  said accident actually took place on 17.6.1998, in the Final Report/ Charge-sheet submitted by the Investigating Officer, Dehu Road Police Station,  on  18.8.2000, the date of offence is shown to be 10.6.2000, which is totally incorrect. 9. That the Hon'ble Lower Court ought to have rightly held that it was, merely an accident, and not an offence. 10. That there was a great mistake in lodging the FIR on 8.8.2000, which should give the benefit of doubt for acquittal of the accused. 11. That the appellant respectfully submits that while framing charge, on 7.4.2001, the date of the offence is shown to be 10.6.2000. 12. That the Hon'ble Lower Court ought to have held that the evidence given by the PW No. 5, Shri MKK, who had undertaken the work of construction as a contractor, to the effect that the said water tank was covered by wooden planks and tin sheets, and as admitted by the PW No. 3, Shri GVJ, that theft is a common instance in the area, and hence, the same must have been  stolen away by the thieves,  leaving the water tank unprotected. 13. That it was not correct and proper on the part of the Learned Lower Court to conclude that the said water tank was uncovered, because the PW No. 3, Shri GVJ, the PW No. 5, the concerned contractor, as well as the PW No. 8, Shri DDK, supported, said and reiterated that the three sides of the tank were closed by a wall and protected by a wire fencing,-there was no access to the construction site, and the said witness, Shri Kale, also added that the accused never visited the construction site during the work, and that the plot is fenced by wire fencing. 14. That the Hon'ble Trial Court ought to have considered the fact that registering an offence against the accused-appellant was an afterthought, for, as per the version of the PW No. 7, Shri MHC, ASI, who admitted that prior to the FIR, the incident was registered as an accidental death. That the  Hon'ble Trial  Court  ought to  have  taken  into 15. consideration that when the PW No. 6, Shri GRM, says that the incident took place on 8.8.2000, it means that such a mistake on the part of the prosecution could be accepted only with a view to giving the benefit of doubt to the accused, and not otherwise. 16. That the Hon'ble Trial Court ought to have considered that the prosecution failed to prove any offence on the part of the appellant. 17. That the Hon'ble Lower Court ought to have considered that the appellant was not responsible for the death of the deceased boy - Abhishek, who was found drowned in the water tank which was constructed by the contractor engaged by the appellant for the purpose of construction of a house for him. 18. That the Hon'ble Lower Court ought to have held that the drowning of the deceased boy was caused only on account of an accident for which the appellant was not at all responsible.  19. That the Hon'ble Trial Court was at an error in holding that the said offence was committed by the appellant by a rash and negligent act on his part. 20. That the Learned Lower Court was wrong to have come to a tacit conclusion that it was due to a rash and negligent act on the part of the appellant that the death of the deceased boy was caused. 21. That the Hon'ble Trial Court ought to have held that there was neither mens rea on the part of the appellant to cause death nor any knowledge that the act done in all probability will cause death. 22. That the Hon'ble Lower Court ought to have considered that the appellant did no act, which could be termed as a rash or negligent act and is directly the immediate cause of death of the deceased boy. 23. That the Hon'ble Trial Court also ought to have held that there was, in fact, no criminal intent on the part of the appellant, which was an essential ingredient to constitute an offence. 24. That the appellant respectfully submits for the kind and sympathetic consideration of this Hon'ble Court that there was no rash or negligent act on the part of the accused-appellant which could have been the direct or proximate cause of the death of the deceased boy. 25. That  the  accused-appellant respectfully  submits  for the favourable consideration of this Hon'ble Court that the Learned Lower Court ought to have determined that the accused cannot be held to have the knowledge that he was likely by such act to cause the actual result, but the appellant has been so unhappy that the dangerous consequences have been unfortunate. 26.That the Learned Trial Court ought to have held that the act of the accused-appellant in its nature is not at all criminal, and hence, only on that merit, the accused-appellant deserves a clear exoneration. 27. That the Hon'ble Lower Court ought to have rightly held that the section under which the accused-appellant was tried for the offence does not apply to the instant case where the death has arisen, not from the negligent or rash mode of doing the act, but from some result supervening upon the act which could not have been anticipated. 28. That this appellant fervently submits that proper care and due precaution to guard against an injury either to the public generally or to an individual in particular was taken by theappellant by putting wooden planks  and     tin  sheets for covering the water tank, which was then dry and empty. 29. That this appellant submits that the said water tank was empty and dry, for the construction work was already stopped for want of funds as well as on account of shortage of water supply in the month of May 2000, that is the beginning of the summer season. 30. That the appellant submits and brings to the kind perusal and consideration of this Hon'ble Court the very fact that when the rainy season started only in the first week of June 2000, the said empty and dried tank was filled in with rainy water, and by the time, all the wooden planks covering the said tank were also found already removed away and stolen by the unknown persons, because the same could be very useful as firewood which is normally used by the population residing in the nearby vicinity. 31. That the Learned Lower Court ought to have decided that the accused -appellant had taken a sufficient precaution to prevent any untoward happening. 32. That  the  Hon'ble  Lower  Court  ought  to  have  taken  into consideration the very provision of law that there must be mens rea in the criminal negligence also, and since the same is absent in the instant case,  it cannot be termed as an offence. 33. That  the  appellant  respectfully  submits  for  sympathetic consideration of this Hon'ble Court that the circumstances under which the deceased boy was drowned were beyond the control of the appellant, and hence, he is not guilty of such an offence. 34. That there was a factual mistake to say that the said tank in which the deceased boy was drowned was uncovered and unprotected, for it is admitted by the witnesses that the said tank was under a stare case. 35. That the Learned Lower Court was wrong to hold that the P.W. No.l, Shri GSD, who is the father of the deceased boy, was present when the dead body was taken out. 36. That it was a totally wrong decision of the Learned Lower Court that the said water tank was uncovered and unprotected and also that even the construction site was accessible and was not fenced. 37. That the Hon'ble Trial Court erred in arriving at a tacit conclusion that it was an illegal omission on the part of the accused. 38. That even though the said accident took place between 16.30 hours and 20.30 hours on 17.6.2000, the panchnama was drawn two days thereafter on  19.6.2000,  and hence, the Hon'ble Trial Court must have considered this issue in favour of the accused. 39. That the appellant fervently submits that he deserves kind and sympathetic consideration, and accordingly he prays for the mercy of this Hon'ble Court, at least, on humanitarian grounds. 40. That the order is dated, 7.3.2003, while its certified copy was applied for and delivered the same day, and hence, the appeal filed today is well within limitation. 41. That certified copies of the judgment and order, dated 7.3.2003. in S.T.C.C. No.  1100/2000, and the other proceedings are filed herewith. 42. That the necessary court fee is paid herewith.  43. That the appellant, therefore, prays that - (i) For the reasons stated above and as may be argued at the time of hearing, this appeal may kindly be allowed;  (ii) The record and proceedings in S.T.C.C. No. 1100/2000 in the court of the Hon'ble Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Vadgaon Maval, be called for;  (iii) The order under appeal be set aside and quashed, and orders deemed just and proper be kindly passed; (iv)The appellant be kindly acquitted from the offence punishable u/s 304(A) of the Indian Penal Code 1860; Download Word Document In English. (Rs.60/-) Download PDF Document In Marathi. (Rs.60/-)

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL  BEFORE HIGH COURT  In the High Court at ………….. (Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) In the matter of an Application for anticipatory bail under section 439, Cr PC Shri……………………………………..……  son of Shri………………………………...  residing at………………..................... ............................................................................................................ Petitioner versus The State ............................................................................................ Respondent To Chief Justice and His Companion Justices of the Hon'ble Court The humble petition of …………., the petitioner above-named RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:-  1. That petitioner being an eminent trader with a long-standing business in ……………… and being an income-tax and sales-tax assessee.  2. Petitioner permanently reside in ………………...  3. Due to personal enmity, my neighbour, Mr ……………..., lodged a vexatious complaint against the petitioner before police alleging hurt..  4. That factually complainant intents humiliating/harassing applicant and tarnishing his image in society.. 5. Your petitioner fears that by said complaint the police may arrest petitioner by throwing the petitioner to mental harassment, trouble and physical inconvenience. 6. That the petitioner undertakes to obey all the terms/conditions as imposed upon him on order of bail. 7. That if anticipatory bail is not allowed the petitioner will suffer irreparable injury. 8. That the application is made bona fide and in the interest of justice. The petitioner humbly prays that Your Lordships may kindly pleased to instruct if petitioner being arrested concerning this case the petitioner will be released on bail immediately/or may pass such other order/orders as Your Lordships may deem proper and fit.  And your petitioner is duty bound, shall ever pray.  Advocate. Signature of Petitioner. Verification I, Shri………………………………………..……… son of Shri……………………………………….….., by occupation business, residing at………………………………………………………………………………………...… .................. do hereby solemnly affirm and say as follows:  1. I am the petitioner above-named. I know the facts of this case and I am able to depose thereto. 2. The statements in paragraphs 1 to 8 in the foregoing petition are true to my knowledge and belief. 3. I sign this verification on the …… day…………..  in …………………….. Solemnly affirmed by the said Shri………………day of ………………. in the Court  at . DEPONENT  Download Word Document In English. (Rs.15/-) Download PDF Document In Marathi. (Rs.15/-)

Download Word Document In English. (Rs.90/-) Download PDF Document In Marathi. (Rs.80/) seeking exemption from personal apperance of Complainant/Accused     IN THE COURT OF …………..………………………….LD.  METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE/ Addl. Sessions Judge,  CRIMINAL COMPLAINT NO. _______OF 2015, or FIR No._________________ Police Station____________ Under Section____________ IN THE MATTER OF: Mr. ………………                                                                                                                                                                   …….COMPLAINANT VERSUS  State and XYZ                                                                                                                                                                       ..……ACCUSED APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION OF THE PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF THE COMPLAINANT / ACCUSED MOST RESPECTFULLY- 1.  That the above-mentioned matter is pending before this Hon’ble Court and is listed today for hearing. 2. That the Complainant / Accused is busy in some inevitable administrative work/ is unwell/ is out of station and issues unable to appear before this Hon’ble’ court today. 3. That the absence of the applicant is neither intentional nor deliberate, but due to the bonafide reason mentioned above. PRAYER: –It is, hence, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to exempt the Complainant / Accused from the personal appearance for today through his Counsel in the interest of justice. COMPLAINANT/ACCUSEDTHROUGH COUNSEL Place  : Delhi Dated : ………, 2015   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------     Regular Bail Application before Court of Metropolitan Magistrate u/s 437CrPC     IN THE COURT OF SH.__________________________________________METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATR, NEW DELHI APPLICATION FOR REGULAR BAIL UNDER SECTION 437 Cr.PC BEFORE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE State vs ____________________Accused FIR NO. _____  UNDER SECTION _____________ IPC, P.S.- ____________________. MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:-1- That the petitioner belongs to a respectable family and he has clean antecedents.2- That the petitioner has been framed up and falsely implicated in the above noted case by the complainant on extraneous grounds and he is in custody since _____________.3- That the police does not require further custody of the petitioner for the purpose of investigation in the case and the petitioner has therefore been remanded to judicial custody.4- That the petitioner has been framed up in the case because _____________ daughter of Sh._________________ complainant was deeply in love with the petitioner and her marriage wassolemnized with Sh._____________ son of Sh. ________________,R/o House No.___________________ against her wishes on __________. Even after marriage _____________ wanted the petitioner to continue friendly relationship with her due to attachment but the petitioner always advised her that since she has been married to another person, she should try to forget her past relationship with the petitioner.5- That the investigation of the case and thereafter the trial shall take a considerable time and the petitioner shall suffer unbearable hardship of imprisonment if he remains confined to Jail during this period.6- That the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish bail bonds to the satisfaction of this Hon’ble court for his being released on bail.7- That the witnesses of the prosecution are relatives of the complainant and they can not be influenced by the petitioner. The petitioner gives an undertaking to the Hon’ble court, that if he is released on bail, he shall not temper with the evidence or influence the witnesses of the prosecution and he shall abide by any condition imposed by the Hon’ble court for releasing him on bail. It is, therefore, prayed that the petitioner/applicant may kindly be released on bail. Applicant shall abide by any direction or condition this court may pass. Dated: _________ Applicant/petitioner. Advocates  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------     Regular bail Application before Court of Sessions Court u/s 439 CrPC     APPLICATION FOR REGULAR BAIL UNDER SECTION 439 Cr.PC BEFORE SESSIONS COURT State vs ____________________Accused FIR NO. _____  UNDER SECTION _____________ IPC, P.S.- ____________________. MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:-1- That the petitioner belongs to a respectable family and he has clean antecedents.2- That the petitioner has been framed up and falsely implicated in the above noted case by the complainant on extraneous grounds and he is in custody since _____________.3- That the police does not require further custody of the petitioner for the purpose of investigation in the case and the petitioner has therefore been remanded to judicial custody.4- That the petitioner has been framed up in the case because _____________ daughter of Sh._________________ complainant was deeply in love with the petitioner and her marriage wassolemnized with Sh._____________ son of Sh. ________________,R/o House No.___________________ against her wishes on __________. Even after marriage _____________ wanted the petitioner to continue friendly relationship with her due to attachment but the petitioner always advised her that since she has been married to another person, she should try to forget her past relationship with the petitioner.5- That the investigation of the case and thereafter the trial shall take a considerable time and the petitioner shall suffer unbearable hardship of imprisonment if he remains confined to Jail during this period.6- That the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish bail bonds to the satisfaction of this Hon’ble court for his being released on bail.7- That the witnesses of the prosecution are relatives of the complainant and they can not be influenced by the petitioner. 8- The petitioner gives an undertaking to the Hon’ble court, that if he is released on bail, he shall not temper with the evidence or influence the witnesses of the prosecution and he shall abide by any condition imposed by the Hon’ble court for releasing him on bail. 9- Applicant shall abide by any direction or condition this court may pass. It is, therefore, prayed that the petitioner/applicant may kindly be released on bail. Dated: _________ Applicant/petitioner. Advocates  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------     Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC   IN THE COURT OF SH.__________________ LD. SESSIONS JUDGE, NEW DELHI Criminal Misc. Case No. ...... of ......In the matter of, AB .................................. Petition erversusState ... Respondent FIR NO. _____  UNDER SECTION _____________ IPC, P.S.- ____________________. Application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 Respectfully showeth:-1. That petitioner being a senior citizen is living a retired life.2. That even though applicant is not keen in selling his house, some local Property dealers have conspired with some criminals/anti-socials to pressurise him for sale of his house.3. That some criminals of area, namely,...............conspired to malign/harass the petitioner publicly by implicating him and lodging an FIR at the Police Station at..........4. That petitioner being a senior citizent can not hide and if compulsory he shall co-operate in police investigation. Anticipatory bail be granted to petitioner. :5. That if anticipatory bail is not allowed petitioner suffer irreparable injury.6. That petitioner undertakes to obey all terms/conditions on passing order of bail.Hence prayed that Your Honour will be pleased to allow the petitioner anticipatory bail and other order /orders asYour Honour deem fit and proper.And for this act of kindness your petitioner shall ever pray. Petitoner/Accused through Advocate  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   Application seeking Anticipatory Bail Under Section 438 CrPC   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF DELHI(Criminal Original Jurisdiction)Crl.. P.No . of 2012InCrime.No . Not known of 2015(On the file of the Inspector of Police. ____ Police Station, Mandir Marg, New Delhi) Mr.______...Petitioner/Accused Versus GNCT Delhi, Rep. by its Inspector of Police, Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi Crime. No. Not known of 2015...Respondent/Complainant PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL FILED UNDER SECTION 438 OF Cr.P.C The petitioner states as follows:1. The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the Respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sec. ____, ____ of IPC.2 The address for service of all processes and notices on the petitioner is that of his counsel M/S. ______, advocate, ___________.3. The address for service of all processes and notices on the Respondent is as set out in the cause title above.4. --------- Brief fact -----5. It is submitted that ______ has given a false complaint to the Respondent Police which has been taken on the file of the Respondent Police (crime No. not known) due to the influence of ________.6. It is submitted that the petitioner apprehends arrest by the Respondent Police on the basis of the complaint taken on file (Crime No. not known). The petitioner is the only son to take care of hisparents. The petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. _____ is abusing the criminal process and falsely accusing the petitioner. It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon`ble Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the Respondent Police (Crime No. not known) as this Hon`ble Court maydeem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and render justice. Dated at New Delhi on this the th day of _ 2012.Counsel for PetitionerNote:1.This is the first application by the petitioner.2.Bail to the satisfaction of the_________Magistrate, ________.  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------       Application seeking Bail Under Section 167 CrPC BEFORE THE HONOURABLE ___METROPOLITAN  MAGISTRATE COURT AT NEW DELHI CC.No . of 2015StateVs1...Accused FIR NO. _____  UNDER SECTION _____________ IPC, P.S.- ____________________. APPLICATION FOR BAIL U/S 167 OF Cr.P.C FILED BY THE COUNSEL FOR THE ACCUSED 1. That the accused in the above numbered case has been arrested by the______police on ________ on charges of U/S ____ of IPC and he is in custody since then.2. That the police has been reluctant to conduct investigation and submit its report in time. They have not filed the charge sheet in Court even after the completion of statutory time period of _______(60 or 90 as applicable) days.3. The accused is not related to the above offences and he is ready to furnish bail. Hence it is most respectfully prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to release the acccused on bail. Dated atNew Delhi on this the ___ day of __ 2015. Counsel for Accused ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   Application Under Section 320 CrPC for Compounding of Case   BEFORE THE HONOURABLE _______ Metropolitan Magistrate at New Delhi CC.No . of 2012 --------Cause title------- PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 320 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1. The petition is filed by the complainant/defacto complainant/CW1 and accused in the above numbered case.2. The above numbered case has been chargesheeted against the accused under sections_____ of IPC3. That the matters related to the case has been settled and compromised between the parties in the presence of mediators/counsels. There is no need for the case to be proceeded with. Hence it is prayed that this Honourable Court may accept and effect the compromise between the parties by allowing this petition. Dated at New Delhi on this the ____day of _ 2015 Complainant                                         Identefied by Counsel Accused                                               Identefied by Counsel   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   Affidavit of Surety in support of Bail Bond   Surety Affidavit AffidavitI, ____ son of ____ ,R/o ____, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:-   1- That the deponent is the permanent resident of the above said address. 2- That I have never stood any surety in any other case and the documents produced by the deponent are genuine 3- That the accused namely ___ is my real ____ and I have full controll over him/her. 4- That I am standing surety on behalf of the accused in the above mentioned case. 5. That accused shall appear on each and every date of hearing without fail. 6. That I have understood that in case of a sngle breach of bond I shall be liable tp pay to the statean amount equivalent to this Bond's amount.   Deponent Verification:- Verified that the above contents of this affidavit are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and nothing has been concealed therein. Verified at ____ on ____ Deponent  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------       Application Under Section. 311 Cr.P.C.for Recalling of Witness   IN THE COURT OFSh.________________________Ld. METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, New Delhi C. C. No. of 20............................ PETITIONERS/ACCUSED.VS.. ...........................RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT. FIR NO. _____  UNDER SECTION _____________ IPC, P.S.- ____________________. APPLICATION UNDER SEC. 311 Cr.P.C.FOR RECALLING OF WITNESS The petitioner above named states as follows: 1. The petitioner states that his counsel on record was unable to appear before this Hon’ble Court on.................. for the reason that he was down with fever. 2. The petitioner states that it is neither willful nor wanton but due to the reason stated above. 3. The petitioner states that the balance of convenience lies in his favour, further to get rebuttal evidence from the PW –................ it is just and necessary to cross-examine the PW –..................as this is an important witness of fact and absence of cross examination by defence would be detrimental to the petitioner's case . Hence the petitioner shall be permitted to cross-examine the PW – ..................... 4. The applicant is ready to bear the cost of PW-.......reappearance in the Court. In these circumstances it is therefore prayed tha this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to reopen and recall the PW – ......and cross examine in the interest of justice and thus render justice. Dated at , this the day of , 2015Counsel for Applicant  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   Application seeking adjournment under Sec. 256 of Cr. P.C.   IN THE COURT OF MS._____________________ METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,NEW DELHI C.C. No. of 20 ...Petitioner/ Complainant.Versus...Respondent/ Accused. FIR NO. _____  UNDER SECTION _____________ IPC, P.S.- ____________________. Application seeking adjournment under Sec. 256 of Cr. P.C. The Petitioner/ Complainant / Accused above named states as follows; 1. The petitioners state that the above case is coming up today for further proceedings. 2. The petitioners state that the petitioner could not appear before this Hon’ble Court as he is............................................or his Counsel is down with fever. 3. The absence of the petitioners/ his counsel is neither willful nor wanton but due to the reasons stated above. In these circumstances it is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioners/ Complainant and allow them to appear through their counsel Under Sec. 256 Cr.P.C. for today only and thus render justice. Dated at this the day of, 2015 Counsel for ...Petitioner/ Complainant.   -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   Criminal Complaint of an offence before the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate   Introduction As per S. 190 of Cr PC, any Magistrate can take cognizance of any offence upon receiving a complaint, or upon a police report, or upon information received from any person other than a police officer, or upon his own knowledge. As per S. 193 of Cr PC, a Court of  Session cannot directly take cognizance of any offence. The Magistrate may "commit" the case i.e. transfer the case to Court of Session if the offence is trialable only by Court of Session (S. 209). S. 200 CrPC specifies the procedure for complaining to a magistrate of any offence.  There is no prescribed form of a complaint. The term Complaint is defined inSection 2 (wa) CrPC. It ca even be oral. In general:           The complaint can either be for a non-cognizable offense or for a congizable offence, if the police refuses to register FIR It must be addressed to Court of Magistrate It should state facts relating to the offence The Complaint must pray for action against the prepetrators of Crime Format of a Crimnal Complaint before the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate   In the Court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi Criminal Complaint No. ... / 2009 Name of Complainant.................New Delhi                                .........................................  Complainant           Vs. Name of Accused................New Delhi                         .........................................  Accused         Police Station................................ Under Section.............................. District.........................................   Complaint of Offence under offences....................................IPC   The aforementioned complainant begs to state as under:-     That the complainant is a resident of ......................................New Delhi That the accused is a resident of .............................., which is in the neighbour hood. Since ...............................date, the accused and his friends have started harrassing the complainant,..............................(details of offence) house every evening and late night. The accused and his friends ...........................................Additional details. Due to this behavior the complainant and his family is not able to life peacefully in his house. The complainant has requested the accused several times to stop playing in front of or near his house but to no avail. The complainant also gave the respondent a written notice in this respect. The complainant, therefore, prays that –(a)  appropriate proceeding be initiated against the accused under Cr P C.(b)  the accused be stopped from continuing the.........................................offence details.(c)  the accused be summoned, tried and convicted of the offence underSection................IPC(d)  the accused be ordered to pay compensation for medical treatment, mental agony to the amount of 10,000/-   Place: ………………….                                                                            (Signature of the Complainant)Date: …………………..                                                                               Annexures- 1. List of witnesses 2. List of documents 3. Memo of addresses

ANTICIPATORY BAIL BEFORE SESSIONS JUDGE In the Court of Sessions Judge at....................................................... Criminal Misc. Case No. ................................................ of ………………………………....... In the matter of: An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 And In the matter of:   ................................................................... Petitioner                                                  versus The State of………………................................... Respondent The humble petition of the petitioner above-named Respectfully showeth:- 1. That petitioner being a …………………….………………………….. working   at……………………………………….. 2. That relating with his sovereign duties he has to raid against criminals/anti-socials. 3. That some criminals of area, namely,……………………...............conspired to malign/harass your petitioner publicly by implicating him and lodging an FIR at the Police Station at…………………......... 4. That petitioner being a …………………………… can not hide and if compulsory he shall co-operate in police investigation. Anticipatory bail be granted to petitioner. : 5. That if anticipatory bail is not allowed petitioner suffer irreparable injury. 6. That petitioner undertakes to obey all terms/conditions on passing order of bail. Hence prayed that Your Honour will be pleased to allow the petitioner anticipatory bail and other order /orders as Your Honour deem fit and proper. And for this act of kindness your petitioner shall ever pray. Advocate of …………………………………. Verification I ………………………………….., son of …………………………………….….., resi………… ....................................... do hereby solemnly affirm and say as follows: 1. I am the petitioner above-named. I know the facts and circumstances of this case. 2. The statements in paragraphs 1 to 6 hereinabove in the petition are true to ray knowledge and belief. 3. I sign this verification on this …………………............ at …………………….. Solemnly affirmed by the said …………. on this………………..at…………….. . Notary/Magistrate Deponent  Download Word Document In English. (Rs.30/-) Download PDF Document In Marathi. (Rs.30/-)

कार्य अनुबंधों के निष्पादन के लिए एक अधिकारी को नियुक्त करने का संकल्प   संकल्प किया गया कि श्री ए को ………. राज्य में कंपनी के अटॉर्नी के रूप में नियुक्त किया जाता है और उन्हें उस राज्य में कंपनी की ओर से पूर्व-निर्माण मिट्टी उपचार से संबंधित अनुबंधों को निष्पादित करने का अधिकार दिया जाता है।   कि श्री ए की नियुक्ति से संबंधित मुख्तारनामा, जैसा कि ऊपर उल्लेख किया गया है, और बोर्ड के समक्ष रखे गए मसौदे के अनुसार और पहचान के प्रयोजनों के लिए अध्यक्ष द्वारा हस्ताक्षर किए गए, कंपनी की सामान्य मुहर के तहत निष्पादित किया जाता है, ऐसा निष्पादन और कंपनी के आर्टिकल्स ऑफ एसोसिएशन के अनुच्छेद 84 के अनुसार कंपनी के किन्हीं दो निदेशकों के हस्ताक्षर के तहत होना चाहिए। Download PDF Document In Hindi. (Rs.15/-)

एसोसिएशन के ज्ञापन में परिवर्तन के लिए संकल्प - एक नए खंड का सम्मिलन   कंपनी लॉ बोर्ड की पुष्टि के अधीन, कंपनी के मेमोरेंडम ऑफ एसोसिएशन के खंड IIIA को मौजूदा उप-खंड 3 के बाद निम्नलिखित नए उप-खंड (3A) के सम्मिलन से बदल दिया जाएगा:   (3ए) लोहे की ढलाई, यांत्रिक इंजीनियरों, और मशीनरी, संयंत्रों, उपकरणों, उपकरणों, उपकरणों, इंजनों, बर्तनों और औजारों के निर्माताओं और पीतल-संस्थापकों, धातु-श्रमिकों, मिलराइट्स, मशीनिस्टों के व्यवसाय को आगे बढ़ाने के लिए, लोहा और इस्पात कन्वर्टर्स, लोहार, लकड़ी-श्रमिक, पेंटर, धातुकर्मी, इलेक्ट्रिकल इंजीनियर, इलेक्ट्रीशियन, प्रिंटर, कैरियर और व्यापारी और मशीनरी, संयंत्रों में खरीदने, बेचने, निर्माण करने, मरम्मत करने, बदलने, बदलने, किराए पर लेने और सौदा करने के लिए , उपकरण, उपकरण, उपकरण, इंजन, बर्तन, उपकरण, रोलिंग-स्टॉक, और सभी प्रकार के हार्डवेयर और किसी भी अन्य व्यवसाय (विनिर्माण या अन्यथा) को चलाने के लिए जो कंपनी के संबंध में आसानी से किए जाने में सक्षम प्रतीत हो सकता है ऊपर, या जो इंजीनियरिंग या निर्माण गतिविधियों या कंपनी के व्यवसाय, या कंपनी द्वारा किए गए किसी भी अनुबंध के साथ उपयोगी या सुविधाजनक रूप से जोड़ा जा सकता है, और या तो केवल ऐसे अनुबंधों के उद्देश्य के लिए या एक स्वतंत्र के रूप में सेंध व्यापार Download PDF Document In Hindi. (Rs.15/-)

एसोसिएशन के ज्ञापन के परिवर्तन के लिए संकल्प - एक मौजूदा खंड का संशोधन   कंपनी अधिनियम, 1956 की धारा 17 के तहत कंपनी लॉ बोर्ड की पुष्टि के अधीन, कंपनी के मेमोरेंडम ऑफ एसोसिएशन के खंड IIIA के उप-खंड (9) को शब्द के बाद "समामेलन" शब्द डालकर बदल दिया जाए। To" की पंक्ति 1 में दिखाई दे रहा है। Download PDF Document In Hindi. (Rs.15/-)

एसोसिएशन के अनुच्छेदों के परिवर्तन के लिए संकल्प   संकल्प किया गया है कि कंपनी के एसोसिएशन के लेख निम्नलिखित तरीके से बदले जा सकते हैं:   (i) अनुच्छेद 5 के बाद निम्नलिखित नए लेख 'प्रबंध निदेशक' के शीर्षक और क्रमांक 5ए से 5डी तक जोड़े जाएंगे:   5ए. कंपनी अधिनियम, 1956 की धारा 197ए, 269, 316 और 317 के प्रावधानों के अधीन, बोर्ड समय-समय पर एक या एक से अधिक निदेशकों को कंपनी का प्रबंध निदेशक या प्रबंध निदेशक नियुक्त कर सकता है और समय-समय पर ( उसके या उनके और कंपनी के बीच किसी भी अनुबंध के प्रावधानों के अधीन) उसे या उन्हें पद से हटा दें या बर्खास्त कर दें और अपने या उनके स्थान या स्थानों पर किसी अन्य या अन्य को नियुक्त करें।   5बी. कंपनी अधिनियम, 1956 की धारा 255 के प्रावधानों के अधीन, एक प्रबंध निदेशक, जब तक वह उस पद पर बना रहता है, रोटेशन द्वारा सेवानिवृत्ति के अधीन नहीं होगा, और उसे कंपनी के रोटेशन का निर्धारण करने के उद्देश्य से एक निदेशक के रूप में नहीं माना जाएगा। निदेशकों की सेवानिवृत्ति या सेवानिवृत्त होने वाले निदेशकों की संख्या तय करने में लेकिन (उनके और कंपनी के बीच किसी भी अनुबंध के प्रावधानों के अधीन) वह अन्य निदेशकों के रूप में इस्तीफे और हटाने के समान प्रावधानों के अधीन होंगे और वह वास्तव में और यदि वह किसी भी कारण से निदेशक का पद धारण करना बंद कर देता है, तो तुरंत प्रबंध निदेशक नहीं रह जाएगा।   यदि किसी भी समय प्रबंध निदेशकों की कुल संख्या निदेशकों की कुल संख्या के एक तिहाई से अधिक है, तो जो प्रबंध निदेशक सेवानिवृत्त नहीं होंगे, उनका निर्धारण उनकी संबंधित वरिष्ठता के अनुसार किया जाएगा। इस अनुच्छेद के प्रयोजन के लिए प्रबंध निदेशकों की वरिष्ठता बोर्ड द्वारा प्रबंध निदेशकों के रूप में उनकी संबंधित नियुक्तियों की तारीखों द्वारा निर्धारित की जाएगी।   5सी. कंपनी अधिनियम, 1956 की धारा 309, 310 और 311 के प्रावधानों के अधीन, एक प्रबंध निदेशक को इन लेखों के तहत कंपनी के निदेशक के रूप में देय पारिश्रमिक के अतिरिक्त ऐसा अतिरिक्त पारिश्रमिक प्राप्त होगा जो समय-समय पर हो सकता है। कंपनी द्वारा स्वीकृत।   5डी. कंपनी अधिनियम, 1956 के प्रावधानों के अधीन और विशेष रूप से उसकी धारा 292 में निहित निषेधों और प्रतिबंधों के अधीन, बोर्ड समय-समय पर एक प्रबंध निदेशक को सौंप सकता है और इन के तहत प्रयोग की जाने वाली ऐसी शक्तियों को प्रदान कर सकता है। बोर्ड द्वारा प्रस्तुत करता है जैसा कि वह उचित समझे और ऐसे समय के लिए और इस तरह के उद्देश्यों और उद्देश्यों के लिए और ऐसे नियमों और शर्तों पर और ऐसे प्रतिबंधों के साथ प्रयोग करने के लिए ऐसी शक्तियां प्रदान कर सकता है और बोर्ड ऐसी शक्तियों को या तो संपार्श्विक रूप से प्रदान कर सकता है या उस संबंध में बोर्ड की सभी या किन्हीं शक्तियों के अपवर्जन और प्रतिस्थापन में और समय-समय पर ऐसी सभी या किन्हीं शक्तियों को निरस्त, वापस, परिवर्तित या परिवर्तित कर सकता है। Download PDF Document In Hindi. (Rs.20/-)

एसोसिएशन के लेखों में परिवर्तन के लिए संकल्प - जहां लेखों का नया सेट अपनाया जाना है   यह संकल्प लिया गया है कि बैठक में प्रस्तुत किए गए मुद्रित दस्तावेज़ में निहित विनियम और उसके अध्यक्ष द्वारा हस्ताक्षरित पहचान के प्रयोजनों के लिए एतद्द्वारा अनुमोदित किया जाता है और कंपनी के अंतर्नियम के रूप में अपनाया जाता है और सभी मौजूदा उसके लेख Download PDF Document In Hindi. (Rs.15/-)